2.1 KiB
+++ title = "AT&T is pulling some serious doublespeak right now." summary = "Is AT&T a common carrier, according to AT&T? It depends on who's asking." date = 2015-01-10T12:00:00-06:00 tags = ["att", "ftc", "fcc"] categories = [] params.inReplyTo name = "AT&T defends unlimited data throttling, says the FTC can’t stop it" summary = "FTC has no jurisdiction because AT&T is a common carrier, company tells judge." url = "https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/01/att-defends-unlimited-data-throttling-says-the-ftc-cant-stop-it/" params.inReplyTo name = "AT&T tells FCC it can’t treat mobile data as a common carrier service" summary = "Question may hinge on whether broadband can be a substitute for phone service." url = "https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/01/att-tells-fcc-it-cant-treat-mobile-data-as-a-common-carrier-service/" params.syndication name = "Medium" url = "https://medium.com/trwnh/at-t-is-pulling-some-serious-doublespeak-right-now-8fc64f268f36" resources name = "featured" src = "opengraph.jpg" +++
The FTC is suing AT&T over its mobile data policies, particularly throttling "unlimited" customers. AT&T filed a motion to dismiss this suit, saying that since AT&T is a common carrier, they fall under the jurisdiction of the FCC instead.
Except just a few days later, AT&T tells the FCC that mobile data doesn't fall under common carrier rules, and cannot be regulated without Title II.
So, which is it?