28 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
28 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
|
+++
|
||
|
|
+++
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# the semantics of some types are unclear or poorly defined
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Note vs Article
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
see [Note vs Article]({{<relref "note-vs-article.md" >}}) for more. but basically:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
in summary:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
> Note: Represents a short written work typically less than a single paragraph in length.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
> Article: represents any kind of multi-paragraph written work.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
but this is contradicted by as2/ap examples.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
the messy general consensus post-spec seems to be about "intention", but this is never defined. it is unclear what a `Note` is intended to be, and what an `Article` is intended to be, beyond very loosely and very vaguely tying such notions to app-specific abstractions or behavior. for example, Mastodon will show a Note more or less in full, but convert an Article to a title and url.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
it would have been better to define it similarly to HTML `<article>` perhaps? an independent unit of writing? one that is published and therefore might reasonably be syndicated?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Mention
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
> Mention: A specialized Link that represents an @mention.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
this is an incredibly narrow definition and also one that is often useless. what's so special about an @mention?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
it would have been better to define it in terms of, idk, generating a notification or something? like a webmention?
|