20 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
20 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
|
people think activitypub is a network protocol when it's really more like a programming language. you don't say "compatible with c++" you say "written in/with c++". similarly, we might say that fedi is "written with activitypub" or "implemented using activitypub", not "compatible with activitypub" or anything suggesting a network.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
analogously:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
ap = inter-process communication (e.g. d-bus)
|
||
|
|
as2 = data interchange format (e.g. protobuf)
|
||
|
|
json-ld = media type
|
||
|
|
rdf = facts and logic
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
if we're being honest the majority of "fedi" is part of the "network" that is "compatible with mastodon". mastodon *is* the network protocol. we just express it in terms of "mastodon-flavoured activitypub"
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
put another way, there is no such thing as "fedi", but rather, multiple different and distinct "fedis" that only partially overlap.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
it occurs to me that activitypub may be best thought of as a cms with an optional distributed storage backend
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
similarly: no one in fedi is doing real activitypub. it is probably more appropriate to say we are doing AS2 + Linked Data Notifications
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
side effects are more accurately defined by the mastodon documentation than by the activitypub spec
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
we're kind of in the situation where someone has invented the C Programming Language, maybe D-Bus, but we still don't have a FreeDesktop.org or XDG equivalent.
|