From 41178501fe890f71fc09029654eb46b13aba9846 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: a Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 19:33:21 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] fix some formatting --- public/unstable/what-is-web.html | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/public/unstable/what-is-web.html b/public/unstable/what-is-web.html index 1487e6b..4c4ecb6 100644 --- a/public/unstable/what-is-web.html +++ b/public/unstable/what-is-web.html @@ -8,6 +8,10 @@ article { max-width: 80ch; } + aside { + font-size: 0.8em; + opacity: 0.8; + } @@ -25,7 +29,7 @@

would it be correct or accurate to categorize this as a matter of governance? in that case, who are the constituents? imo the constituents are people who want to be social on the web, and software projects that let them do that, and whatever service providers enable the whole thing

-

the other thing that leads me to this post is my own musing at roughly the same time (but unrelated to the first thing) about the differences between "fediverse" and "social web", which are pretty clearly not synonyms to me. but that got me thinking: what even *is* the web? (so this is kind of a follow-up to that.)

+

the other thing that leads me to this post is my own musing at roughly the same time (but unrelated to the first thing) about the differences between "fediverse" and "social web", which are pretty clearly not synonyms to me. but that got me thinking: what even is the web? (so this is kind of a follow-up to that.)

the many webs interpretation